Life in the Palace

Destiny is not enough.


Leave a comment

More FAQ’s….or more accurately actual FAQ’s

author pic final cropped small

Don’t you already have a FAQ section?

I do, but those were the questions I asked myself. These are real questions asked by people who exist outside of my head. I’ll add these to the official FAQ page.

 

Don’t Seth and Chloe ever have sex?

(This really is the most frequently asked question.)

They do. Repeatedly, I just didn’t write it. For a number of reasons:

1. This is YA book, I know some YA books have plentiful sex scenes but many don’t and I didn’t want to cut out a section of the YA market.

2. I’m religious. I try not to read books with graphic sex scenes so I wasn’t going to write one.

Ok, that wasn’t so many reasons but if felt like a lot.

 

But it would have been fun….

Yep. It would have been. And still no. On the other hand, feel free to write as much Seth and Chloe getting it on fanfic as you would like.

 

The ending??!!!

Chill. Life in the Palace is the first book in a five book series. I promise you it’s not Allegiant. You will not need to make voodoo dolls to punish me when it’s all over. And I promise I won’t make you follow Seth and Chloe for five books just to make them get together in three lines in the last chapter.

Isn’t that a spoiler?

No. This is a YA fantasy romance. If they don’t get together at the end then there’s something wrong with the universe.

Can they have sex at the end? Like in Twilight?

They might well have sex before the end. And I might still not write it. How about I write books 3 and 4 before we start negotiations for book 5?

 

Why do the People (Tal and her crew) hate the Others?

They don’t hate them. They spend most of their lives trying to keep the world turning for the Others. But they do live apart from them, and that separation creates tension and misunderstanding. We see the results of this in Life in the Palace. It’s discussed more later in the series, so don’t be surprised if Tal learns that the world isn’t as black and white as she thought it was.

 

When is the next book out?

The third book in the series, Camp in the Shadow, should be out in September 2014.

September? That’s a long time to wait. Why so long?

Because I have to write it. And because the books are written to go with the content on the facebook pages. As Camp in the Shadow covers Chloe and Seth’s lives from September 2013 to August 2014, it has to come out after that or it will mess up my ability to lead multiple lives on facebook.

The only way I can get a Seth and Chloe fix before then is to follow them on facebook?

No. Jen’s Story, a companion novel that tells what happened in the time between Life in the Palace and To Call Your Name, should be out in May.

 


Leave a comment

Bug Checking Tutorial – 1

tal headshot

Hi guys,

This is the first in an occasional series giving pointers on bug checking. Today we’re going to be looking at onions. I’ll be demonstrating with a regular yellow onions but the method is the same for Spanish and red onions.

When buying your onions check that there are no green shoots growing out of the top on the onion, like this:

20140321_095341

Also feel around the top of the onion to make sure you have a nice firm one like this:

20140321_095359

When preparing to check the onion, first cut off the top part just as the main bulb of the onion begins, like this:

20140321_095502

Next cut off the bottom of the onion (don’t worry if there are some roots on the onion) and remove the outer layers of brown skin. Then your onion will look like this:

20140321_095651

Now cut the onion in half lengthways, and carefully remove the outer two layers of each half, like this:

20140321_095832

Look inside the onion to see if there are any bugs. You are looking for small specks that might be moving. Hold the onion pieces up to the light for more through inspection.

20140321_095853

Once you are sure that there are no bugs inside your onion sample, you can go ahead and cook with both the sample layers and the remaining onion.

If you want more information on onion infestation, here is a great link from The New England Vegetable Management Guide

Bon Appetit!


Leave a comment

The Palace crew in haiku

author pic final cropped small

I go to a weekly writing workshop because it’s important to always be improving your craft. Last week we had to write a series of  14 haiku’s on the same topic, similar to the famous 14 Ways of Looking at a Blackbird. I wrote 14 ways of looking at kids. Then when I finished first (gripping about parenting comes easy to me,) my friend dared me to write haiku’s about parenting in the voice of the Palace characters. I took it as a challenge.

Here are the results:

sethThumbI don’t do diapers

Babysitting was not my choice

Don’t tell the guys

 

 

chloeThumbPeanut butter kills

Racing, hoping to save her life

Please let it be okay

 

tal headshot

One day to be mine

As soon as college is done

It will be my turn to be a mom

 

 

spikeThumbBetter left alone

I’d rather be an aunt

Please be negative

——————————————————————————————————————-

Why are you posting? I expected Seth or Chloe.

I know, but this is the month the books came out. Seth and Chloe have been ‘busy.’

You’re too lazy to update your own blog?

No, look I’m posting now. Don’t worry next time we should be back to Seth and Chloe.


Leave a comment

Who is watching us?

sethThumb

Freedom: it’s something we all prize. America proudly proclaims itself to be the land of the brave and the land of the free. It could easily be argued that a life without freedom is hardly worth living.

But what are we trying to obtain freedom to do? To make our own choices? To define our own future? Few of us would argue that we are free from the turning hands of Fate. If our life can turn on a dime, if the plane can veer off course and bring down the tallest building in NYC, if disease can rob us of our loved ones, if the right combination of numbers can bring sudden millions; how can we suggest that freedom buys us the chance to choose our future?

So what does our freedom buy us? Maybe the chance to make our own mistakes. To run down the side of  a mountain in a giant hamster wheel because some man in a bar dared us to. To find love and hold onto it with all our might. We often assume reflexively that freedom is the freedom to do as we choose without repercussions.

We also expect that technology will increase our freedom. Our phone will mean we never lose touch with our loved ones. The funny thing we saw on the way to work can be immediately photographed and saved for prosperity. When my music collection can go wherever I go, I can dictate the soundtrack of my life.

The same technology that gives us freedom can also curtail it. Governor Christie is battling for his future political life in a scandal that started with an email. A trail of computer files has led to the downfall of countless collectors of child pornography. In these cases, one might argue that the absence of freedom to do harm is a sacrifice to the greater good.

In a move worthy of George Orwell, the Ukrainian government was able to pinpoint cell phones in the vicinity of anti-government protests and send threatening text messages. Following the outcry over the NSA recording phone calls in the USA, we see that even the freedom of private citizens might not be as free as we hoped.

Should this send us into a frenzy of anti-government protest? Should we all take to the hills ready to protect our families from the men in black? Maybe it’s time to recognize that we were always being watched.

We have never had the freedom to conduct our lives unobserved. All our deeds have been noted and duly recorded, and not by Santa or the NSA. As the illusion of freedom without being called to account for our choices falls away, we see that we were always required to make choices that would withstand the test of scrutiny. We are being watched and come the final accounting we will be free to be judged by the content of our character alone.


Leave a comment

When Death Hangs in the Balance

sethThumb

Pontificating from armchairs across the country, the nation has watched as the parents of Jahi McMath fought to keep their daughter on life support and the husband of Marlise Muñoz fights to take her off life support. Our TV screens are filled with a slew of experts passionately defending each side of the argument. When does life start and end? What does it mean when the brain is dead but the heart is still beating?

In the Western world, nine out of ten deaths are due to aging. Then we know what to do. Granny doesn’t wake up one day and we mourn her passing but there is no debate as to whether or not she died.

It’s the other one out of ten cases when we have problems. When it was too young, too soon, too unexpected. It’s harder when medical science gives us the chance to hold on, to keep our precious daughter or to give the unborn child a chance to live. Then we have to create a definition of what it means to die. When medicine can give a body life almost indefinitely we are asked to choose when death comes.

Most of us are not ready to do that. We watch the drama unfold on our TV screens and we shake our heads and bemoan the fate of someone else. We don’t open the Scripture and our hearts. We don’t sift through medical journals and weigh up philosophical arguments. We let the questions go unanswered and hope we never have to decide.

But there’s a one in ten chance you’ll be the one whose death lies in the balance. If not you, then maybe a loved one. Perhaps, it’s worth dedicating at least the same amount of time you spent filling in your tax return, to understanding the nature of death.  Then, when the time comes and the doctor is waiting for a decision, you know what you want to do. After all it is only death and taxes that we can be sure to see eventually.


Leave a comment

Selfies: the great liberator?

jenThumb

Everything is a trend. Get enough people doing it and it’s the next big thing. Once something’s the big thing all the pundits need to jump on the bandwagon.

Take the selfie. Now even the President’s busy taking self-portraits. The internet is full of one arm wonders. There’s even a site dedicated to selfies taken at funerals. Before you could say ‘Instagram,’ all the pundits were bemoaning the fall of civilization collapsing under the weight of our collect narcissism.

The newest craze in the fashion world is plus sized models. Finally ‘real women’ are gracing the covers of magazines, or so we’re told. No sooner have we lauded the fashion industry for taking a brave move forward than the backlash begins. The so called ‘plus sized models’ can be anything from a size 12 upwards. Only in the fashion world is a 12 a plus size.

Now the most cutting edge trend is to trash the fashion industry for using not actually plus sized models, squeezing out the actually plus sized models from the market and causing the rest of us innocent bystanders to start thinking a 12 is really a plus size.

Maybe we’ve got it all wrong. Maybe the selfie is the answer to all our problems. If we get so used to seeing real pictures of real people, maybe we’ll just stop believing all the body image lies fed to us by the fashion industry.

The Curvy Girls plus sized lingerie store in San Jose was flooded with responses when they asked customers to post pictures of themselves in lingerie. Beautiful real women in all shapes and sizes.

http://curvygirlinc.com/regular-woman/

Maybe the selfie is the savior of civilization after all.


Leave a comment

Selling ‘reality’ worts and all

Chloe

Freedom of speech is enshrined in the US Constitution, unfortunately so is freedom of stupidity. The fuss over Phil from Duck Dynasty’s comments in his GQ interview illustrates this only too well as it follows all the standard lines, (His comments were offensive. …He has a right to free speech…. He was just stating his religious views… His religious views are outdated …….) I can’t help wondering if we brought this all on ourselves.

Any American has to right to hold true any crazed randomness that comes into their head. They have the right to share it with anyone they choose. The internet gives them the ability to share their personal brand of insanity far and wide. But the rest of us don’t have to listen. No one forces us to share, retweet or give the crazies more publicity.

Reality TV is the modern day version of traveling freak shows. Snookie, Phil and the rest of the reality TV ‘celebrities’ are the modern elephant man and bearded lady. Together with the voyeuristic appeal of reality TV, is this thrill of revulsion from watching characters we’d run from in real life.  Safe in our living rooms we can be titillated by lives so unlike our own.  We want our reality TV stars to be outlandish and outspoken. It adds to our enjoyment. But we don’t actually want them to be real. The thrill of revulsion is only safe if it stays within the script.

Phil stepped outside of his permitted script. Apparently he didn’t know that he was allowed to be ‘himself’ as long as he kept his less mainstream views private.  You could say he only has himself to blame. In truth, responsibility lies with the A&E network, the show’s 14 million views, and all of the rest of us following the debate online. We are the ones that gave a platform to one man’s personal views.

Next week the media will have moved onto a new scandal. No one will have changed their view on gay marriage. No one will have developed a more nuanced reading of the Bible. I doubt any non-believers soul will have been saved. But we will all have been entertained. At what prices comes our entertainment?